Got a medical marijuana card? You can’t own a gun

Federal law prohibits selling firearms to marijuana users

If you hold a medical marijuana card in Arizona, you cannot possess a firearm.

This may come as a surprise to you, said Sherrie Seibert, co-owner of Insight Firearms Training.

“We’re seeing customers coming into the store … and have no understanding, because either they are uninformed or misinformed, that, when they hold a (medical marijuana card) … they are a prohibited possessor by federal law.”

“The (U.S.) Department of Justice has long had a ban on gun sales to marijuana users,” Yavapai County Attorney Sheila Polk said.

That’s because, although the state of Arizona allows the use of medical marijuana, it’s still illegal to possess or use under federal law.

Seibert said, “My concern is, we’ve got so many people who are acquiring these (medical marijuana cards), who do not understand that it does have a negative impact on their ability to possess firearms legally.”

A letter sent to firearms dealers by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) several years ago said that “any person who uses or is addicted to marijuana, regardless of whether his or her state had passed legislation authorizing marijuana for medicinal purposes, is an unlawful user of or addicted to a controlled substance, and is prohibited by Federal law from possessing firearms or ammunition.”

The ATF went one step further, noting that, even if a person writes on the purchasing form that they are not a cardholder, if the dealer is “aware that the potential transferee (buyer) is in possession of a card,” the dealer still can’t sell the buyer a gun.

Seibert said that, in just about every concealed-carry class Insight holds, there are “a couple” of medical marijuana users who find out they’re in violation of the law.

This issue has been taken up in court, as well.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling in July 2016, backing the ATF’s policy.

In that case, a medical marijuana cardholder was denied the right to buy a firearm even though she said she didn’t actually use marijuana; the court ruled that she “could acquire firearms and exercise her right to self-defense at any time by surrendering her registry card.”

The plaintiff in that case argued that the ATF letter was intended to “crush the medical marijuana movement,” but the court said if the federal government wanted to do that, all it would have to do is enforce the existing laws.

While she argued that her constitutional rights were being violated, the panel of judges held that she “does not have a constitutionally protected liberty interest in simultaneously holding a registry card and purchasing a firearm.”

Comments

Comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to our Use of Service Terms of Use agreement. Rambling or nonsensical comments may not be posted. Comment submissions may not exceed a 200 word limit, and in order for us to reasonably manage this feature we may limit excessive comment entries.

JD 1 year, 6 months ago

Old news really- but maybe a great way to either pit the gun owners against the AMMA and it's card holders... or to highlight the ridiulousness of cannabis prohibition in the first place.

You have veterans that spilled blood for this country, and it's 2nd amendment, that are treating the results of their service with cannabis and avoiding becoming opiate addicts... and they are not allowed access to their 2nd amendment right becasue they are avoiding opiate addiction? How does that make sense?

0

ramrodd 1 year, 6 months ago

The right of a citizen to bear arms, in lawful defense of himself or the State, is absolute. He does not derive it from the State government. It is one of the high powers" delegated directly to the citizen, and `is excepted out of the general powers of government.' A law cannot be passed to infringe upon or impair it, because it is above the law, and independent of the lawmaking power." [Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 394, at 401-402 (1859)]

0

ramrodd 1 year, 6 months ago

The TRUTH about the "supremacy clause" - our Constitution does not delegate to the national government authority to restrict our arms, ammunition, regulate firearms dealers, do background checks, etc. The national government may not lawfully circumvent this restriction by means of a treaty wherein the signatory governments agree to disarm their Citizens or Subjects. https://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/?s=The+TRUTH+about+the+%22supremacy+clause

0

GO1984 1 year, 6 months ago

Where is the NRA? Had it been Alcohol instead of Weed, they would be out by the millions. NRA is strangely silent as our rights get trampled even more. How many gun related calls have our local police rolled on involving alcohol vs marijuana?

0