Letter: We don’t need law that would put citizens in peaceful protest at risk

Editor:

Did you think you have a 1st Amendment Right to free speech and peaceful assembly? Well, think again. In the midst of all the brew ha ha at the national level, the Arizona State Senate quietly passed SB 1142 last week.

The bill, which is meant to target organized crime and racketeering, was extended to peaceful protest. Basically it says that anyone planning or participating in a protest in Arizona that turns violent can be arrested and have their assets seized.

This law would apply even if the perpetrators are not part of the demonstration, even if the demonstrators do not participate in the violence and EVEN IF THERE IS MERELY THE SUSPICION THAT THERE MIGHT BE VIOLENCE.

If you think this is an attempt to suppress your 1st Amendment Right to free speech and peaceful assembly, you might give your Arizona House of Representatives a call and express your thoughts before they vote on SB 1142.

Rioting is already illegal in the state of Arizona. We don’t need a law that would put concerned citizens participating in peaceful protest at risk of losing their homes and assets-and we certainly don’t need a law suit from the ACLU, which is watching this bill very carefully.

Cynthia Malla

Cottonwood

Comments

Comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to our Use of Service Terms of Use agreement. Rambling or nonsensical comments may not be posted. Comment submissions may not exceed a 200 word limit, and in order for us to reasonably manage this feature we may limit excessive comment entries.

The_Uppity_Peasant 1 year, 8 months ago

This is called fascism, F-A-S-C-I-S-M, fascism.

1

Habl2 1 year, 8 months ago

SB1142 would set a terrible and dangerous precedent that would undermine our basic 1st Amendment protections. If this were to be passed on a national level, we'd be seriously looking at leaving this country for a real democracy.

Not that applying SB1142 on a personal level might not make sense. Suppose our president were to be held financially accountable for the damage caused by his false assertion that he saw thousands of Muslims cheering in NJ as the Twin Towers came down. How many personal assaults and beatings would have been avoided had he not made and repeated that statement? How many mosques (four so far this year) might have been saved?

0