Letter: What has become of integrity of our Constitutional process?

Editor:

Those of us who were born after the end of WWII and before 1956, give or take, remember the civil unrest over the Vietnam War. Protests were everywhere, it seemed, and as the war raged on they grew ever more frequent, populated, and even violent.

The media, eventually including the venerable Walter Cronkite, bought it, characterizing the protesting as acts of the people. That was the end of LBJ’s future presidential aspirations. Indeed, he said that if he’d lost Cronkite, then he’d lost the people, and so he declined to run for another term in the 1968 election. Perhaps this is what the Left is hoping for our current president as 2020 approaches.

But whether or not you are a Trump fan, you need to look back at what happened during what we might call the Vietnam War years, and then what was revealed in the years afterward. Clearer-minded individuals claimed that those protesters were not common folk who simply came out to express displeasure with their government. They were organized and paid by outside forces, in this case the Soviet Union. Alas, their warnings were dismissed as little more than paranoia.

However, within a decade or so after the last “official” troops left the Southeast Asia theatre, investigations and documents showed that a significant number of the Vietnam War protests had not only been orchestrated by Communist interests but that many of the so-called protesters had been paid to protest.

Now we have similarly spreading nationwide protests, this time against ICE, our immigration policies, and President Trump. And just like in the late ‘60s and early ‘70s, hundreds to thousands of protesters are congregating, in some cases more protesters than reside in the totality of nearby communities. What’s more, it’s not just on weekends, when most adults aren’t working. No, these crowds show up in the middle of the week. Don’t these people have a job? Or is it their “job” to protest?

And again like in the Vietnam War protests, too many of their signs are either identical or carrying identical messages, as if the sign makers and carriers had been told what to write and, yes, when and where to show up.

Am I being defensive? Maybe. But remember the riots (which the media called an “unrest”) in Ferguson, MO in 2014 when a black man was killed by a white police officer? Protesters (and concomitant rioters and looters) showed up in droves. Yet the truth was that many of them had been bused to Ferguson from as far away as New York (surprise surprise). Now who paid for their bus tickets, meals, and more? No one knows. At least, no one has been looking.

So when I see a gazillion people show up on a Thursday morning to march in protest for this or that Left Liberal cause, I wonder. How did they get there? Who directed them to go there? Who provided their signs? Who paid for their transportation, food, housing, etc.?

This is not about President Trump. Like him or not, he is our president. No, this is about our nation and, more importantly, the integrity of our Constitutional process and in that the respect of both law and civility. When the exercise of our 1st Amendment rights to freedom of speech, assembly, and address of grievances ignore the personal and societal responsibility inherent therein, those rights and freedoms become ever more in jeopardy.

Michael C. Westlund

Clarkdale

Comments

Comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to our Use of Service Terms of Use agreement. Rambling or nonsensical comments may not be posted. Comment submissions may not exceed a 200 word limit, and in order for us to reasonably manage this feature we may limit excessive comment entries.

centurion75 2 months, 2 weeks ago

I find this particular piece of fiction highly offensive: That demonstrating protesters are being bused in and paid to protest. So Mike, is that the way it is with every demonstration you disagree with? Where are your facts? How about the people protesting Trump's immigration policies? Paid protesters, I suppose (must have cost billions). Your statements are a lame attempt to discredit what people are saying. What you don't think protesters can make their own signs, drive to events on their own? You affirm the 1st amendment, but you are contemptuous of those with opposing viewpoints. Time to turn off state TV (Fox news).

0

Pfalbo 2 months, 2 weeks ago

Fascinating.

Blame protesters for what is wrong in the US.

That is a consistent, typical right-wing tactic. Next, question their sexuality-- that always works, too, when the government wants to discredit individuals.

Conjure ridiculous conspiracy ideas about protesters exercising their Constitutional Rights.

Ignore the Fact that the Gulf of Tonkin incident, LBJ's ostensible cause for War, was conjured by LBJ et al. (https://www.usni.org/magazines/navalhistory/2008-02/truth-about-tonkin).

Ignore the fact that the State Department and Military Command stoked the fears in America of the possible communist threat in Southeast Asia that if Viet Nam fell, the whole region would fall to communism: the now absolutely disproven and incorrect Domino Theory.

Thus the need for War.

Americans now vacation in North Viet Nam.

58,000-plus dead Americans all because of government lies, absolutely incorrect and inaccurate intelligence and wrong-headed policies by those who prefer war.

But, to you, it's the demonstrators at home that should be questioned.

Amazing, people wishing for Peace are to be beaten down; and, to you, I presume, the war mongers hailed heroes.

0

tbabbitt 2 months, 2 weeks ago

The constitution guarantees the right to free speech and the right of the people to assemble. Any protest, paid for or not, is part of the Constitutional process.

0

lostone1413 2 months, 2 weeks ago

The Constitution has pretty well been thrown in the garbage since the War Of Northern Aggression

0