Letter: Fears over Bible instruction unfounded

Editor:

I read with interest Mr. Leibforth’s guest editorial “Bible class a bad mix for public high school curriculum.” His arguments, in my view, are insufficient for his conclusion to keep Bible instruction out of high schools. His suggestion of leaving it to parents to familiarize their children with the Bible is good; however, since the Bible was taken out of our schools the trend has clearly been increasing ignorance about biblical things.

The core idea he advances would have been foreign to the nation’s founders: that the public square or conversation should exclude all religious expression. We all agree that sectarian indoctrination is undesirable in a school setting; but this has nothing to do with the value of understanding the text of the book most responsible for our heritage, to say nothing of what until very recent times was believed to be the source of the country’s moral and legal values.

The principle stated so eloquently by Thomas Jefferson (separation of church and state, so stated in a private letter from his pen) was important to the founders because they feared the federal government choosing an official religion.

They emphatically did favor public religious expression and the acknowledgement of the Creator, from whom our ideals, said they, derived.

Mr. Leibforth then proceeds to ask questions which expose his basic misunderstanding of the purpose of putting a Bible course in secondary curricula. His questions convey the fearful specter of “religious indoctrination”, a straw man fallacy by the stringent requirements of the Arizona statute authorizing elective Bible instruction for credit.

The purpose of teaching the content of the Bible in secondary education, where students should be developing critical and independent thinking skills, has to do with exposing them to educational content which will enhance their understanding of literature, history, the arts, and the moral values on which western civilization rests. This newspaper’s readers will find much testimony to the value of Bible instruction at the website www.teachthebibleinschools.org.

I applaud Leibforth’s encouragement of parents to teach their children in their choice of religious expression, or of no religious expression. Many whom I know have been diligent to do this. At the same time, however, most people find this a difficult and uncomfortable task they have little time for. I likewise laud his obvious appreciation for the individual person’s worth. But this ought to incentivize us to provide the broadest possible liberal arts and classical education for our children, not just in private schools, but in all our schools.

For most of our nation’s history the Bible was taught in public education. We are not wiser than our forefathers in this regard. We owe it to our youth to let them achieve their potential by providing them the tools of knowledge and the historical context of our culture.

Barry W. Jones

Cottonwood

Comments

Comments are not posted immediately. Submissions must adhere to our Use of Service Terms of Use agreement. Rambling or nonsensical comments may not be posted. Comment submissions may not exceed a 200 word limit, and in order for us to reasonably manage this feature we may limit excessive comment entries.

pinonbistro 1 week, 1 day ago

Separation of church and state is a founding principle of our country. Many of our ancestors came to this country fleeing religious persecution. In my view we start down a slippery slope if we make bible studies part of our public education curriculum. This is especially true today when some with political power are using religious rhetoric to demean or restrict others who have different beliefs. I agree that all should be free to express their religious beliefs in public conversation but in my opinion that is far different from introducing bible studies to our public schools.

0

Doogster 1 week, 1 day ago

This letter is so wrong in so many ways it's impossible to list them all. The references to the so-called forefathers- or should we just say slave owners- is erroneous at best. Man-made religion was created when people thought the earth was flat and inclement weather a sign that "god" was punishing them for their bad deeds or thoughts.

Anyway, most manufactured ideologies from the past were created by those in power at the time to keep all the others subdued and subservient. How many more christians aligning themselves with Trump and children being molested by priests do these people need before they start to realize that they should be thinking for themselves and not just passing it off as "god's will."

It is this complicity with fallacy and lack of true courage that has us all in the bind we are in.

0

The_Uppity_Peasant 6 days, 12 hours ago

The Founders (a misnomer to my mind) were also reared on and deeply studied the Classics, meaning all of the available sources and text from the ancient Greco-Roman world, in the original languages. They were as influenced by these historical cultures as they were by the Bible. Which is why they founded a Republic, based on Rome, not a theocracy, based on the Bible. I'm about as hostile to the Bible and its God as one could be, yet I have no problem with teaching the Bible in public schools as long as it is done in an academic and scholarly manner. If they teach the Bible then they will HAVE to teach everything else: paganism, satanism, witchcraft. By opening the door to their friends they also must leave it open for their enemies. And that is where scholars such as myself come in. You corrupt my kid, I will corrupt yours. Have a nice day, folks.

0