State audit showed Camp Verde schools lacked adequate computer controls
CAMP VERDE — In Fiscal 2017, students’ passage rates at Camp Verde Unified School District were about 10 percent less than the peer districts’ averages, and between 10 percent and 20 percent less than statewide averages.
This information comes from a report the Arizona Auditor General released to the district on Sept. 5. The report can be seen at azauditor.gov/sites/default/files/19-207_Report.pdf.
Although Camp Verde Unified’s operations “were reasonably efficient, the district lacked adequate computer controls, which increased its risk of unauthorized access to sensitive data, errors, fraud, and data loss,” the audit stated.
The district is not certain if computer controls played a role in the July systems crash, Business Manager Steve Hicks said.
“I can’t say if there was any correlation,” Hicks said Thursday. “Most of the technology recommendations by the Auditor General in this report were already implemented by the time the virus hit us.”
Hicks also said that Camp Verde Unified is “steadily getting things up and running” regarding the systems crash.
“It is still a few weeks until everything is back up,” Hicks said.
In its report, the Auditor General recommended the district make five changes to how it handles its computer controls.
Those recommendations included implementing and enforcing stronger network pass requirements, limiting user access, as well as decreasing the quantity of users with administrator-level access.
In his response to the Auditor General’s Office, Camp Verde Administrator-in-Charge Danny Howe wrote that the district found the “process and procedures realized during this audit to be fair and beneficial.”
The district “believe[s] this process will aid us to further our goals of accountability, transparency, academic excellence and fiscal responsibility.” Howe also wrote.
Howe became the district’s administrator-in-charge in February 2018.
The Auditor General’s report also stated that Camp Verde Unified “sometimes used an unallowable bus to transport students to and from school, posing an increased risk to student safety.”
The district stated in its response that it had used white extracurricular buses to transport some of its students to and from school because it has “not been able to keep a full staff of bus drivers.”
The district only uses its yellow buses to transport its students to and from school “along with increasing salaries and other benefits to bus drivers with the expectation of employing a full bus driver staff,” the district’s response stated.
The Auditor General’s Office recommended that the district no longer use the white vehicles to take students to and from school.
“We understand now it was not an appropriate resolution to the problem,” the district’s response stated.
Administrative costs 32 percent less
Camp Verde Unified’s per-pupil administrative costs were 32 percent less than the peer districts’ average, the report said “primarily because of lower administrative staffing levels.”
“We did not have any cost findings,” Hicks said. “When you compare us to other districts, we were pretty pleased.”
Hicks defined cost findings as situations where a district was “overspending the public’s money, not being efficient or not being transparent. Most of [the Auditor General’s] year-long work was reviewing these types of spending records.”
Although the district’s cost per square foot exceeded the peer districts’ average, Camp Verde Unified’s cost per pupil was less because it operated and maintained 42 percent fewer square feet per student than the peer districts, on average, the report explained.
“Districts that operate substantially lower amounts of square footage per student tend to have higher costs per square foot because of higher usage, which can increase heating and cooling costs and result in the need for more custodial services to keep the space clean,” the report stated.
-- Follow Bill Helm on Twitter @BillHelm42